10 Reasons Why Tyson vs. Paul Didn’t Deliver for Boxing Fans

Photo by Netflix/TVDBStudio

Admit it, you (and a million others) were excited to watch this game—a 27-year-old vs. a 58-year-old multi-champion boxer. It promised to be an epic showdown, but did it live up to the hype? Sadly, no. Many see it as a low point for boxing—a spectacle fueled more by hype than by skill. Here, we break down ten reasons why Tyson vs. Paul left boxing fans disappointed.

Overhyped Build-Up

Kevin Jairaj/Imagn 

The hype leading up to Tyson vs. Paul was over the top, with media outlets creating expectations that didn’t match reality. The focus on social media hype overshadowed genuine boxing events. Regardless, it was the most-streamed sporting event of all time, drawing 108 million viewers globally!

Lack of Real Competition

Kevin Jairaj/Imagn

Tyson’s legendary career, matched against Paul’s limited experience, made it clear from the start—this wasn’t a real competition. It was more of a PR stunt to keep Tyson relevant. Fans hoped for excitement but ended up with an uneven fight that showed a clear gap in skill levels, embarrassing for both fighters.

Mismatch of Skill and Experience

Offside Sports/Imagn

Tyson, a seasoned heavyweight champion, was paired with Paul, who lacked professional boxing credentials. This imbalance created a fight that lacked suspense or genuine competition, which left many feeling that the event was more of a mismatch than a real bout worth watching.

Impact on Boxing’s Legacy

Kevin Jairaj/Imagn

Events like Tyson vs. Paul risk undermining boxing’s rich legacy. The focus on celebrity status rather than skill damages the sport’s credibility and shifts attention away from the dedicated athletes who truly deserve the spotlight in the boxing ring.

Money Grab Over Merit

Kevin Jairaj/Imagn

There was no hiding the fact that this fight was a money grab. With both fighters motivated by paychecks rather than proving themselves in the ring, the match was less about merit and more about maximizing earnings, which tarnished boxing’s reputation.

Lack of Professional Standards

Kevin Jairaj/Imagn 

Unlike traditional professional fights, this fight lacked the preparation and professionalism expected in boxing. Training camps, rigorous promotion, and strategic fight plans were missing. This relaxed approach highlighted the fight as less serious and disappointed fans who expected a professional-level matchup.

Decline in Quality Boxing Matches

Kevin Jairaj/Imagn

Spectacles like Tyson vs. Paul draw attention away from quality boxing. When the focus shifts to gimmicky matchups, it hurts upcoming fighters who deserve recognition for their talent and dedication. This trend marks a low point that hampers the sport’s growth and neglects the genuine talent pool.

Tyson’s Legacy at Stake

Jefferson Graham/Imagn

For a fighter as legendary as Mike Tyson, taking part in an exhibition match like this risked tarnishing his legacy. Fans hoped to witness flashes of the old Tyson, but instead, many felt the performance fell short and didn’t live up to the greatness of his illustrious career.

Questionable Referee Decisions

Kevin Jairaj/Imagn

During the third round, Jake Paul landed a flurry of punches on Mike Tyson. Despite Tyson being in trouble, the referee allowed the fight to continue without issuing a standing eight count or intervening more decisively. Critics argued that leniency was shown to create a more entertaining match rather than enforce standard boxing rules.

Disappointment for Boxing Fans

Kevin Jairaj/Imagn

True boxing fans were disappointed. The fight didn’t showcase skills, strategy, or any of the elements that make boxing great. Instead, it highlighted how far the sport had drifted from its roots and left viewers feeling that it was more of a letdown than an event.